Saturday, March 07, 2009

Love, With Strings Attached

Whenever I read the words "unconditional love", I hear them said in a breathless whisper by a blonde woman in California. She wears white robes that flow down to her bare feet. There's a necklace of sea shells and coloured beads around her throat. Blue eyes shine from her pinkish face. Her expression is one of profound certainty and compassion that you only get from drug abuse. (Or from new age mysticism, the worst drug there is.) She stands on a stone patio by the edge of a cliff, her arms held up and spread wide, as if to hug the whole world. The ocean is pounding against the rocks below.

"Unconditional love!" she yells happily, closing her eyes in bliss. You can barely hear the words over the sound of ocean waves -- and the sound of her own smugness.

I hate this woman. Someone push her off the cliff already.

If you've ever loved in a truly unconditional way, you have been used and abused. Because that's what happens to people who love without any sense of self preservation, without boundaries. You get your ass handed to you. And before it's handed to you, it's battered and deep fried.

And your lover says, "Eat it. Eat your battered, deep fried ass. I need you to do it, as a sign of your love for me."

And if you truly love unconditionally, you will -- like an idiot -- eat your own ass.

Nearly everyone in our culture believes in this unconditional love nonsense. As with most things, you can blame The Beatles. "All you need is love," is the biggest lie there is. Hippie drivel. And if John Lennon were alive, he'd say it differently.

"All you need is love -- and a bullet-proof vest."

You know what else you need? A soul of your own. A piece of you that you can hold on to. A purpose beyond mere feelings. Drive. Determination. Mastery of yourself. Boundaries between you and the rest of the world. A personal philosophy that guides you through life -- specifically, a philosophy that cannot be changed because someone politely asks you to be different.

When you love someone unconditionally, you are giving your soul away. You fade into them. You dissolve. You disappear. You become their slave.

The ideal many believe in is that, as you dissolve into them, they dissolve into you. Unconditional love on both sides. What could be sweeter?

But when two people melt into each other, the result isn't one strong person -- it's a big puddle of slop.

"What do you want to do, darling?"

"I don't know. What do you want to do?"

"I can't really say. You decide."

"No, no -- you decide."

Everyone has met a couple like this. They think they're being cute as they turn to each other and laughingly can't make a decision. And if you're like me, you want to bash their heads together until they're unconscious.

A real, solid relationship is based on negotiation and earned trust. What do I want? What do you want? Can I meet your needs? Can you meet mine? Can we trust each other? Over time, a closeness develops. Each person supports the other. But ideally, they keep their own goals, their own dreams, their own beliefs. They support each other as individuals, reinforcing their own individuality as they do so.

Even as closeness develops, there are always conditions. They never go away. That's because your partner changes and so do you. With each change you have to renegotiate your relationship. How will we meet these new desires, new philosophies, new ideas?

One morning your lover might turn to you and say:

"You know what? I've decided the only way I can be fulfilled as a human being is if I cut off my legs with a chainsaw and get the word 'CUNT' tattooed on my forehead."

I don't care how deeply in love you are -- no sane person says, "I'll go warm up the chainsaw. You call the tattoo parlour and book an appointment."

That's unconditional love, and it's madness. More realistically, you negotiate.

"What if you only cut off your left leg? 'CUNT' is kind of offensive. Maybe you could have 'VAGINA' tattooed on your forehead instead?"

(Okay, bad example. But you get the idea.)

People shouldn't feel guilty when they love, with conditions. It's realistic. Ignore what The Beatles told you. They were stoned when they wrote that stupid song. "Goo goo g'joob"? Come on! You can't trust these guys.

We have to leave space for ourselves in the equation. Drowning in another human being is just a bad idea. Fight for what you believe in. Stand your ground. Give as much as you are able, but ask for something in return. What's the point in being in a relationship where you only give, and give, and give -- and never get anything back?

When someone kneels before me, submitting themselves entirely -- showing what they think of as unconditional love -- it's really tough not to abuse the hell out of them. They're crawling already. What else can I make them do? Will they eat their own turds? Will they let me rip off their nipples with pliers?

That's how the dodo became extinct, after all. The stupid bird had no defences. It loved everyone unconditionally, trusted everyone it met. The dodo knew no enemies. In that position of complete unconditional love, the dodos were rounded up and slaughtered. How could humanity be so cruel? Why didn't we return the dodo's love in an equally unconditional way?

Because the battered and deep fried ass of the dodo tasted so very good.

* * *

Thanks to Mezamashii, who inspired this rant. I will not push you off a cliff, I promise.

12 comments:

v2 said...

My, you're taking quite the conservative bend these days. Were you mugged recently?

I experienced unconditional love once. I don't mean the kind you're talking about, I mean the other kind. The kind where you look out on the world... George W. Bush is torturing American citizens with impunity; Palestinians are launching rockets into Israel; Israel is starving Palestine to death; American soldiers are murdering wedding parties in Iraq; the UN twiddles its thumbs as some new African Nazi party goes genocidal; and American Idol goes into it's umpteenth award-winning season...

You look out on all that and for about four seconds you know without a doubt or a hesitation that all is right with the world. It is as it must be. It couldn't be any other way. And it's all beautiful. Death, and torture, and hate sit at the same table with life, love, and sunshine-unicorn-happiness, and they all eat cake together off of doilies with teeny little dessert forks and make pleasant small talk about the far off places they visited last holiday.

You're right, by the way. The only two ways I know of claiming those four seconds are via psilocybin mushrooms or mindful meditation. Unconditional love: Get yours while supplies last!

Nik said...

I have to admit that my stance on "unconditional love" comes from two sources:

1. A bad love affair where I gave my all, and got totally tortured for it.

2. Dan Savage. He regularly talks on his podcast about the idea of negotiation in a relationship.

I don't understand why this stance strikes you as conservative, except I guess as someone on the left, I should be embracing the mushy-headed new age crappola that some on the left seem to adore.

zoom said...

I have always loved my son unconditionally. It was never a choice; it was simply a fact.

Nik said...

I am willing to make an exception for parents and their children. Having never experienced unconditional love from my parents could be a fluke. And as I will never have kids myself, it's not something I have to think about.

Kropotkunin said...

Nik, you still do not understand what unconditional love is.

Unconditional love has nothing to do with the people you unconditionally love, it has everything to do with *you* and who/what *you* are.

It's all about you, baby, and no one else. Until you realize this, then you will continue to blabber on about unconditional love as if it was someone taking you hostage...which, also reflects on who/what you are.

It just sounds more and more like you just need a little love, excuse me, unconditional love.

Here, take some advice from donkey in Shrek:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMaFjEH1B0g

Nik said...

Kropotkunin:

Let me speak of this one last time, with as much honesty as I can, in one last ditch attempt to make another person understand. Then I'll leave it alone. You can respond to these words, if you like, but I'll probably not answer.

When I talk of slaves, what makes you think I am talking of other people, and not myself? I have been the slave I am mocking. I am making fun of myself.

When you choose to give, unconditionally, to a certain kind of person, you are drained completely. Because some people can never get enough. That is their nature. They NEED so much. And these people can't give very much in return.

It's not even their fault, really. It's who they are. Their weakness, their genetic make up, their tortured past -- it all simply doesn't allow for giving. I'm not talking about sociopaths who don't feel anything, but people in so much pain that they have extremely elaborate ways of protecting themselves from their pain.

One way is not giving much to others. And one way is for asking a lot from others.

You can't give unconditional love to someone drowning, because you'll drown too. That sounds like a metaphor, but I mean it quite literally. There's emotional drowning that is so close to literal drowning, it will still suck you under with them, and you won't be able to breathe.

I have been involved with people who ask for things from me. And I give. And they ask for more from me. And I give. And they ask for more. And I give.

And when I have given so much that I am obviously in pain, they can't let themselves see it. That, sadly, is in their nature too. They feel guilt intensely, because they are so needy. And they know they are needy, and that makes them feel like shit.

When I turn to them and say, "What about me? I'd like something back," they are completely incapable of giving it. And the irony is, what I ask for is simply the same thing that I have been giving them. And the irony is, they mock my request -- even though what I am asking for is exactly what they ask me for, constantly.

Yes, I am talking about our mutual friend, but not just him. There have been others very much like him in my life. I find myself drawn to them, over and over, much like an abused woman who constantly finds herself dating men with fists that swing too freely.

These people have all the answers. They seem to know what they want with complete certainty. They are tantalizing and powerful and wild. But really, at their core, they don't know who they are or what they want and it terrifies them.

My lesson on unconditional love? It's written for me far more than it's written for anyone else. I'm trying to protect myself.

Our friend will almost certainly say, "How could he do this to me, when I was so weak and vulnerable?"

He is not weak, and he is not vulnerable. Drowning victims are very strong. And this type of drowning victim never goes under for long. Bizarrely, they also never swim for shore.

I have swum to shore. And he will hate me for it. But I don't see that I had any choice. I am so very much tired of drowning.

All so very melodramatic. Sorry about that. I'm trying to describe it while avoiding all the details.

Now I'll talk of other things, for the next little while. I hope you can understand why.

Mezamashii said...

I would like to be that idealistic image you painted of the Angelic Mother Nature who hugs the world.

The title "Kill Everything- And if that doesn't work, kill everything twice." It is kind of obvious that unconditional love is a foreign concept here.

I absolutely adore what Kropotkin said, "Unconditional love has nothing to do with the people you unconditionally love, it has everything to do with *you* and who/what *you* are."

Yes, there are sometimes you get absolutely crucified. Sometimes you really do fall over the cliff & it feels like you'll fall forever.

But you know what? Giving your very all is worth it.

v2 said...

I tend to take even the slightest display of levelheaded, rational thought for conservatism, I suppose. But mostly I just wanted to set up the obtuse little pun. ...Comic gold, I tell 'ya!

As for love, I can only advocate one choice. It's the right choice. It's the only choice.

Celibacy.

Mezamashii said...

P.S. I never lived in California. I was raised in foster care in Montana & spent 11 years of my adult life in Idaho before moving to Edmonton.

There isn't much of a pink tone to my face- its more orange. But smug blue-eyed blonde is dead on. LOL.

I bet you are one of those assholes that tells the poor waitress you want separate checks after your meal instead of you just paying this time and your folks just paying the next time. Or you break out the calculator to make sure everyone pays their exact share.

You'd be amazed. There is real freedom in throwing away the scorecard.

Nik said...

Mezamashii:

Please don't assume you know who I am. I'd much rather be called an asshole for the things I actually say, than be called an asshole for the things you imagine I might be. And let's face it -- I provide a lot of asshole material for you to work with. Resist the urge to just make guesses.

Those of you who support unconditional romantic love are either very naive, or very lucky. It doesn't take a lot of imagination to picture the following:

It's scary to be in a relationship for a year, look at the person you're in love with, and realize they are using you. That they really are insane. That all this time, you thought they were trying to give something back, and they weren't. That you misjudged them.

There are people who feed off unconditional love. And not all of them look or act like monsters. They look and act sane.

There's a reason the divorce rate is so high -- and it's not because people don't love enough.

Beatles songs sound awesome as a guidebook for love -- until you meet someone who doesn't sing out of that songbook.

Mezamashii said...

So, my guess is wrong?

I had one of those relationships... it was my first marriage... took me 4 years to figure that one out. Only took you a year. Good job.

George Buckenham said...

I have rejected girls I knew I would have gotten on with fine because they wanted me more than I wanted them. And I knew if I tried I could make them crawl. And, really, I didn't want to, but: how can you resist?

Maybe that's messed up, rejecting them, but I still think it was better than the alternative. (And: it's harder to know, but I guess it's happened in the other direction.)